| 
        
          
            | Budget 
                hooked needle machines.   The 
                design and production of small and inexpensive hooked needle machines 
                first appeared in the USA in the late 1850s. A number of inventors 
                and engineers applied their talents to this class of machine during 
                the subsequent decade. Cheap, practical models were certainly 
                produced, but it is fair to conclude that commercial success was 
                only very limited at best. Surviving machines of this type are 
                scarce today, and this, combined with their diminutive size has 
                ensured that many of today's enthusiasts are keen to add at least 
                one of them to their collections.What follows is a brief look at some of the designs that are known 
                to have made it into production.
 Albert 
                H. Hook's table clamp machine was patented in November 1858. A 
                barbed needle penetrated the stitchplate and fabric from below, 
                and a guide positioned the thread close around the needle. When 
                the needle descended, the barb caught and carried down a loop 
                of the thread through the cloth, which was then fed forward one 
                stitch. The needle again ascended, leaving the loop on it, and 
                by the same process caught the thread and drew another loop down 
                through the first. This was repeated as the sewing proceeded.When manufactured, the machine was extremely tiny - only approximately 
                2 inches by 2 inches above the clamp.
 Two years later Jason W. Hardy patented a very similar looking 
                machine, but the design incorporated modifications with the method 
                of activating a swinging movement of the thread guide. Production 
                machines were approximately double the size of the Hook model.
 |  
          
            |  
                
 Hook's 
                  1858 patent. | 
 Hardy's 
                1860 patent. |  
          
            | Timothy 
              D. Jackson's 1858 patent once again addressed the design of thread 
              guides, in this case the guide was to attached directly to the cloth 
              presser. Machines using this patent were subsequently made and marketed 
              by the Bartlett Company, New York. Also 
                towards the close of the 1850s Edward S. Boynton patented his 
                own distinctive "clamp-on", barbed needle machine. With 
                cost cutting in mind, Boynton attached his needle directly to 
                the crankshaft, thereby creating a simple feed. A variable needle 
                guide was included, this allowing stitch length adjustment. Boynton also made provision within his design for the attachment 
                of an additional larger crank wheel, which when linked by belt 
                to the existing drive, enhanced the speed of operation.
 As with the Hook, Hardy and Jackson designs, the needle still 
                penetrated the worked fabric from below.
 |  
          
            | 
                
 Jackson's 
                  1858 patent. | 
 Boynton's 
                1859 patent. |  
          
            | In 
              1867 Henry J. Hancock patented a small "clamp-on" machine 
              which spawned a number of improvements from others. Hancock's design 
              saw the needle penetrate the fabric from above, unlike the previously 
              mentioned machines. Although distinctive in appearance, the patent 
              only claimed one specific feature, this being an adjustable height 
              stitchplate, employed "to secure a sufficiently firm yet free 
              and readily adjustable hold of the cloth". One 
                year later, using Hancock's basic model, Henry P. Lamson claimed 
                a new spring thread guide to yield against the pressure of the 
                needle, which then carried the thread across its path. Also included 
                was a second guide piece to control the path of the thread as 
                well as close the flexible needle barb. Lamson's design boasted 
                a ratchet device to prevent accidental reverse motion, together 
                with a thread tensioning provision. Despite all these improvements, 
                Hancock's adjustable stitchplate was retained.  |  
          
            | 
                
 Hancock's 
                  1867 patent. | 
                
 Lamson's 
                  1868 patent. |  
          
            | Following 
              close on Lamson's improvements was George H. Fox and Joseph Hubbard's 
              August 1868 patent. In this machine, the rather fussy concept of 
              lifting the entire stitchplate was dispensed with, a new adjustable 
              height "stripper plate" being incorporated instead.  
                1870 saw further developments, this time by Jennie L. Lake. The 
                improvements consisted of, and I quote:"A thread guide and needle closure of a rigid character, 
                but hung so as to be capable of sliding and pressed outward by 
                a rubber, or other suitable spring, on its back, whereby, while 
                all requisite elasticity is secured as regards the working of 
                the needle over or in contact with said device, a more positive 
                and effective action is obtained than is attainable by a thread 
                guide and needle closure of an elastic wire construction."
 |  
          
            | 
                
 Fox & 
                  Hubbard's 1868 patent.  | 
 Lake's 
                1870 patent. |  
          
            | Surviving 
              examples of the Hancock inspired design have surfaced with many 
              slightly different features included, therefore it seems reasonable 
              to speculate that a number of manufacturers produced variants of 
              this class of machine from the late 1860s for several years. It is of interest to note that Henry J. Hancock did not lose total 
              heart with this type of machine, for in 1901 he initiated a patent 
              for a very similar model. The toy market was clearly in mind this 
              time around, and the resulting "Soeze" model manufactured 
              by Batchelor & Stenson did achieve modest sales.
 GDJanuary 2004
 |  
          © All content 
        copyright protected.
            | 
                
 Hancock's 
                  1901 patent. |  |